I build AI systems that run your back office — and I stay on to run them.
Fractional AI operations for owner-led businesses in the UAE. Everything runs on infrastructure you own, with AI processing under your own account — never mine. Not a chatbot, not a report full of recommendations: working systems, operated and monitored, with one person who answers the phone.
Two retainer slots. Built and operated AI agent platforms for a multinational retail group before doing this independently.
Three steps, no lock-in
Teardown
Walk me through one workflow that eats your team's mornings. You leave with a one-page sketch of what an automated version looks like — plus a first-pass roadmap of everything else worth automating — whether or not we work together.
Diagnostic Sprint
The deliverable is not a slide deck. It's:
- One working automation running on your real data
- Your teardown roadmap, ranked into a priority plan
Priced on what's at stake — the time and money the automation saves. If it's not useful, you'll know by week two.
Operations Retainer
I build and operate your AI stack: scheduled runs, monitoring, dead-man alerts, and a monthly report of everything the systems did. Maximum two clients at a time. Cancel monthly.
Systems I build
Invoice exceptions report
A folder of supplier invoices becomes a morning report: price variances vs PO, duplicates, VAT errors, quantity mismatches — with the dirhams at risk on each line.
Tender brief & BOQ comparator
A 40-page tender pack becomes a 2-page brief before your estimator's first coffee: every onerous clause quoted verbatim, BOQ priced against your historical rates.
Quote drafting engine
Enquiry email in, draft quotation out — built on your own historical rates and lanes. Hours of turnaround becomes minutes.
Claims & reputation desk
Insurance-rejection pattern reports that show exactly which claim types leak revenue, plus drafted responses to every patient review.
First-draft engine
Proposals, engagement letters and document reviews drafted from your own precedents — your associates edit instead of starting from blank pages.
The one that eats your mornings
If a process involves documents in, judgement in the middle, and a report out — it's probably automatable. That's what the free teardown is for.
…and the rest of the back office
Same engine, different documents. Each of these is a configuration of the same pipeline — weeks to stand up, not months.
Watch it run
Two systems, recorded end-to-end. No edits inside a run.
How this is different
-
AI extracts. Code decides. AI reads your documents; every number, exception and price is computed by deterministic logic you can audit. No AI judgement in the decision path.
-
Your infrastructure, your data. Systems run on machines and accounts you own; AI processing runs under your own AI account with contractual no-training terms — or fully on-premises for sensitive work. Nothing is held on my servers. There are no "my servers".
-
Operated, not handed over. Software that nobody watches quietly breaks. Every system ships with monitoring and a dead-man switch; if a job doesn't run, I'm paged before you notice.
-
One person, accountable. No account managers, no subcontractors, no deck-then-disappear. The person who built your systems is the person who answers when something matters.
Fair questions
We already tried ChatGPT.
ChatGPT is a chat window — someone has to sit there and prompt it. I build systems that run without anyone prompting them: every morning, on schedule, monitored, with output that lands in your inbox. Different category of thing.
What about our data? It's sensitive.
Everything runs on infrastructure you own — your machines, your accounts, your keys. AI processing happens under your own AI account with contractual no-training terms, and for genuinely sensitive documents there's a fully on-premises option where nothing leaves at all. Every data path goes in the contract.
We have an IT person.
Good — keep them. Your IT person keeps things running day-to-day; I design and build the systems, then train them on it. I'm not replacing anyone; I'm giving your existing team leverage.
How do we know it keeps working?
The same way I know: monitoring with a dead-man switch on every scheduled job. If a run fails or doesn't start, I get paged. You get a monthly report of everything the systems did — runs, exceptions, and what they're worth.
Isn't this expensive?
One administrator is AED 8–12k per month for one pair of hands, eight hours a day. A retainer is systems working around the clock across several departments — and you can cancel monthly. The Diagnostic Sprint exists so you can see the value on your own data before committing to anything ongoing — and it's priced on what's at stake: the time and money the automation will save (typically an estimated AED 9,000–35,000), not on hours.
Why you and not an agency?
Agencies hand you a deck and a rotating subcontractor. I've built and operated this exact class of system inside a multinational retail group — data pipelines, autonomous agents, monitoring, the unglamorous parts that make it reliable. And I'm the person who answers the phone.